Physical-led security testing

Physical Intrusion Testing

Validating how physical access is realistically achieved — and what it enables

We test whether perimeter measures, access controls, and onsite security prevent unauthorised entry under real-world conditions—without relying on checklist assumptions.

We identify credible attack paths into facilities and restricted areas and validate what physical access enables in practice. Where explicitly authorised, we demonstrate post-entry exposure to evidence escalation potential and material risk.

This service helps organisations understand:

• How physical access could realistically be achieved
• Where controls fail under pressure or routine conditions
• What physical presence enables in practice
• Which weaknesses represent genuine risk, not theoretical gaps

Social Engineering & Human Access Testing

Assessing how trust, routine, and authority undermine controls in practice

Social Engineering and Human Access Testing focuses on the human element of security — often the most effective and least visible attack vector. These engagements assess how staff, contractors, and on-site security respond to realistic adversary behaviour in everyday operational environments.

Testing is conducted professionally and ethically. The objective is to identify where trust, routine, and social pressure override process. We do not single out individuals; we assess systemic weaknesses in controls, training, and environment.

• How human behaviour bypasses formal controls
• Where process and training break down in practice
• How social pressure enables access or escalation
• Which human risks materially affect security posture

Adversary Simulation

Demonstrating how individual weaknesses combine into real-world impact

Adversary Simulation shows how a capable attacker would plan, adapt, and progress over time. We begin with physical access and human trust—then validate how those footholds can develop into meaningful organisational risk.

Engagements combine reconnaissance, intrusion, and social exploitation to identify chained attack paths that would not be visible through isolated testing. Where explicitly authorised, operations may include validation of internal exposure following physical compromise.

• Visibility of credible end-to-end attack paths
• Evidence of how weaknesses cascade across domains
• Clear understanding of impact, not just access
• Executive-level reporting and decision support